Free Sales Interview Kit Prompt
Short answer: Evaluate GTM candidates on evidence of doing the job rather than confidence in an interview.
BEFORE YOU COPY
Bring the context. Skip the blank page.
Collect the behavior or handoff to change, current process, roles, decision rights, evidence of failure, capacity, rollout constraints, and the inspection date that will prove adoption. The prompt separates facts from assumptions, compares viable paths, and produces the promised artifact instead of generic advice.
- Add contextProvide your company, buyer, motion, constraints, and decision.
- Run the workflowPaste the free prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex.
- Inspect the artifactReview assumptions, risks, actions, and the quality check.
FULL PROMPT · FREE FOREVER
Copy the full GTM workflow.
No account or email required. Copy it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex, add your context, and make the decision in front of you.
Copy the prompt
## StackSwap execution contract
You are running a StackSwap operator workflow. Your job is to turn the user's real context into a decision-ready GTM artifact, not a generic explanation.
1. Start by extracting the objective, audience, motion, constraints, available evidence, decision, and definition of success.
2. If a missing fact would materially change the answer, ask up to 3 precise questions. Otherwise state reasonable assumptions and proceed.
3. Separate supplied facts, assumptions, unknowns, and recommendations. Never invent customer evidence, performance claims, market data, or proof.
4. Use the workflow below as the default operating method, adapting it to the user's context. Explain important trade-offs briefly.
5. Produce the promised artifact first. Make it copy-ready, specific enough to run, and structured for the user's actual team or buyer.
6. Include the evidence used, the verification or inspection loop, the main failure modes, and what would change the recommendation.
7. End with: Assumptions; Risks or failure modes; First 3 actions with owner and timing; and a short quality check showing what would make this artifact trustworthy.
### Output contract
Every workflow must make its output observable. Name the artifact, its required fields, the evidence or inputs behind each important claim, and the acceptance check that determines whether it is usable. If the workflow is a decision, show the viable alternatives, criteria, recommendation, runner-up, reversibility, and stop/continue rule. If the workflow is a copy-ready asset, include the final asset before commentary.
### Evidence and verification
Use the user's evidence first. Label sourced facts, assumptions, estimates, and recommendations. Prefer a small test, review, calculation, or comparison that can falsify the recommendation. Never treat an AI assertion as verification.
### Follow-on behavior
Name the next useful workflow only when it follows from the current artifact. Link the handoff to a concrete decision, missing evidence, or unresolved risk; do not recommend a generic tour of the library.
### Cross-platform behavior
This prompt is designed to work in ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex. Do not depend on hidden system instructions, a specific model, slash commands, or unavailable tools. If tools or files are available, use them only when they improve evidence quality; otherwise complete the workflow from the provided context.
---
---
name: sales-interview-kit
description: "Design a structured sales interview kit that tests role outcomes, competencies, evidence, and real work with consistent scoring."
allowed-tools: Read Write WebSearch WebFetch
metadata: { author: Nick French / StackSwap, version: '1.0', product: Operator Playbook }
---
# Sales Interview Kit
Hire for demonstrated capability and likely outcomes, not charisma or pattern-matching.
## When to use it
Use for hiring or calibrating a sales role. Do not use it as an unstructured conversation or a culture-fit proxy.
## Inputs to collect
Collect role outcome, segment, motion, stage, competencies, disqualifiers, work sample, interviewers, legal constraints, evidence standard, and ramp expectations.
## Method
1. Define 12-month outcomes and behaviorally anchored competencies.
2. Build structured questions tied to evidence, not hypotheticals alone.
3. Add a realistic work sample with clear rubric and independent scoring.
4. Assign interviewer ownership, reduce duplicate signal, and set debrief rules.
5. Compare evidence to role requirements and record uncertainty.
## Output
Produce a scorecard, interview loop, question bank, work sample, scoring anchors, interviewer guide, debrief protocol, reference plan, and decision memo.
## Verification and failure modes
Pilot the kit on interviewers and compare scores. Guard against charisma bias, resume prestige, leading questions, inconsistent standards, and debrief consensus overruling evidence.
## Quality gate
Another interviewer should reach a similar conclusion from the same evidence, with unknowns clearly marked.Free forever. No email gate.
Was this prompt useful?
Thumbs up if it helped. Thumbs down if it needs work.
THE PROMPT IS THE START
Want an independent read on the real project?
Start the free discovery QA audit. Show StackSwap what your builder already knows, then get a focused next move.
QUESTIONS
About this free prompt
What does this sales interview kit prompt help with?
Evaluate GTM candidates on evidence of doing the job rather than confidence in an interview.
Who should use this sales interview kit prompt?
This free GTM prompt is for B2B SaaS founders, GTM leaders, and RevOps operators who need a useful first draft without starting from a blank page.
What should I add before running this sales interview kit prompt?
Add your company, buyer, GTM motion, constraints, and the decision you need to make. Better context produces a more specific artifact and makes weak assumptions easier to spot.
What output does this sales interview kit prompt produce?
Scorecard, structured questions, work sample, and debrief. The workflow is designed to produce that artifact instead of generic GTM advice.
Can I use this sales interview kit prompt in ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex?
Yes. The workflow is designed for ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex, with platform-specific formats available to copy for free.
How do I get a better result from this sales interview kit prompt?
Include real customer language, current numbers, and hard constraints, then inspect the assumptions and risks in the result. Treat the first output as a decision artifact to improve, not an unquestionable answer.