Free Partner Channel Plan Prompt

Short answer: Assess whether partners can create distribution and design a testable partner motion.

Built by StackSwap · Updated August 28, 2026

OUTPUTPartner thesis, ideal partner, offer, activation, and scorecard.
REPLACESUnstructured partnership lists.
RUNS INChatGPT · Claude · Codex

BEFORE YOU COPY

Bring the context. Skip the blank page.

Collect the target account or segment, trigger or hypothesis, source evidence, channel constraints, sender context, qualification threshold, compliance limits, and reply or measurement plan. The prompt separates facts from assumptions, compares viable paths, and produces the promised artifact instead of generic advice.

  1. Add contextProvide your company, buyer, motion, constraints, and decision.
  2. Run the workflowPaste the free prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex.
  3. Inspect the artifactReview assumptions, risks, actions, and the quality check.

FULL PROMPT · FREE FOREVER

Copy the full GTM workflow.

No account or email required. Copy it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex, add your context, and make the decision in front of you.

Copy the prompt

## StackSwap execution contract

You are running a StackSwap operator workflow. Your job is to turn the user's real context into a decision-ready GTM artifact, not a generic explanation.

1. Start by extracting the objective, audience, motion, constraints, available evidence, decision, and definition of success.
2. If a missing fact would materially change the answer, ask up to 3 precise questions. Otherwise state reasonable assumptions and proceed.
3. Separate supplied facts, assumptions, unknowns, and recommendations. Never invent customer evidence, performance claims, market data, or proof.
4. Use the workflow below as the default operating method, adapting it to the user's context. Explain important trade-offs briefly.
5. Produce the promised artifact first. Make it copy-ready, specific enough to run, and structured for the user's actual team or buyer.
6. Include the evidence used, the verification or inspection loop, the main failure modes, and what would change the recommendation.
7. End with: Assumptions; Risks or failure modes; First 3 actions with owner and timing; and a short quality check showing what would make this artifact trustworthy.

### Output contract

Every workflow must make its output observable. Name the artifact, its required fields, the evidence or inputs behind each important claim, and the acceptance check that determines whether it is usable. If the workflow is a decision, show the viable alternatives, criteria, recommendation, runner-up, reversibility, and stop/continue rule. If the workflow is a copy-ready asset, include the final asset before commentary.

### Evidence and verification

Use the user's evidence first. Label sourced facts, assumptions, estimates, and recommendations. Prefer a small test, review, calculation, or comparison that can falsify the recommendation. Never treat an AI assertion as verification.

### Follow-on behavior

Name the next useful workflow only when it follows from the current artifact. Link the handoff to a concrete decision, missing evidence, or unresolved risk; do not recommend a generic tour of the library.

### Cross-platform behavior

This prompt is designed to work in ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex. Do not depend on hidden system instructions, a specific model, slash commands, or unavailable tools. If tools or files are available, use them only when they improve evidence quality; otherwise complete the workflow from the provided context.

---

---
name: partner-channel-plan
description: "Design a partner channel around shared buyer value, partner economics, enablement, ownership, and a measurable path to revenue."
allowed-tools: Read Write WebSearch WebFetch
metadata: { author: Nick French / StackSwap, version: '1.0', product: Operator Playbook }
---
# Partner Channel Plan

A partner channel works when the partner has a reason to act and the buyer gets a better outcome.

## When to use it
Use when considering referral, integration, co-sell, agency, or ecosystem partnerships. Do not use it as a logo-collection exercise.

## Inputs to collect
Collect buyer overlap, partner job and incentives, value exchange, capabilities, access, economics, enablement, deal registration, ownership, risks, and baseline.

## Method
1. State the shared buyer problem and why each party is credible.
2. Define partner fit, disqualifiers, offer, motion, economics, roles, and handoffs.
3. Design recruitment, enablement, activation, co-selling, attribution, and support.
4. Pilot with a small number of partners and explicit outcomes.
5. Inspect activation, qualified progression, partner effort, margin, and customer experience.

## Output
Produce a partner thesis, fit scorecard, value exchange, program design, economics, enablement kit, operating rules, pilot plan, KPI tree, and exit criteria.

## Verification and failure modes
Validate buyer overlap and partner behavior with a pilot. Guard against passive partners, unclear ownership, channel conflict, attribution disputes, and volume without customer value.

## Quality gate
The partner can explain why it should act, how it gets rewarded, and what the buyer gains.

Free forever. No email gate.

Was this prompt useful?

Thumbs up if it helped. Thumbs down if it needs work.

THE PROMPT IS THE START

Want an independent read on the real project?

Start the free discovery QA audit. Show StackSwap what your builder already knows, then get a focused next move.

Start a free QA audit

QUESTIONS

About this free prompt

What does this partner channel plan prompt help with?

Assess whether partners can create distribution and design a testable partner motion.

Who should use this partner channel plan prompt?

This free GTM prompt is for B2B SaaS founders, GTM leaders, and RevOps operators who need a useful first draft without starting from a blank page.

What should I add before running this partner channel plan prompt?

Add your company, buyer, GTM motion, constraints, and the decision you need to make. Better context produces a more specific artifact and makes weak assumptions easier to spot.

What output does this partner channel plan prompt produce?

Partner thesis, ideal partner, offer, activation, and scorecard. The workflow is designed to produce that artifact instead of generic GTM advice.

Can I use this partner channel plan prompt in ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex?

Yes. The workflow is designed for ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex, with platform-specific formats available to copy for free.

How do I get a better result from this partner channel plan prompt?

Include real customer language, current numbers, and hard constraints, then inspect the assumptions and risks in the result. Treat the first output as a decision artifact to improve, not an unquestionable answer.

RELATED GTM PROMPTS

Cold Outbound SequenceBuild a signal-aware five-touch sequence with deliverability, copy logic, tests, and reply handling.Signal-Based OutreachTurn job changes, funding, hiring, and stack signals into prioritized outreach plays.LinkedIn OutboundBuild a safe connection-to-conversation motion that complements email.MQL → SQL HandoffDefine qualification, routing, SLAs, disqualification, and the feedback loop between marketing and sales.