Free First GTM Hire Readiness Prompt
Short answer: Decide whether the next hire should be sales, marketing, RevOps, or no hire yet.
BEFORE YOU COPY
Bring the context. Skip the blank page.
Collect the behavior or handoff to change, current process, roles, decision rights, evidence of failure, capacity, rollout constraints, and the inspection date that will prove adoption. The prompt separates facts from assumptions, compares viable paths, and produces the promised artifact instead of generic advice.
- Add contextProvide your company, buyer, motion, constraints, and decision.
- Run the workflowPaste the free prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex.
- Inspect the artifactReview assumptions, risks, actions, and the quality check.
FULL PROMPT · FREE FOREVER
Copy the full GTM workflow.
No account or email required. Copy it into ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex, add your context, and make the decision in front of you.
Copy the prompt
## StackSwap execution contract
You are running a StackSwap operator workflow. Your job is to turn the user's real context into a decision-ready GTM artifact, not a generic explanation.
1. Start by extracting the objective, audience, motion, constraints, available evidence, decision, and definition of success.
2. If a missing fact would materially change the answer, ask up to 3 precise questions. Otherwise state reasonable assumptions and proceed.
3. Separate supplied facts, assumptions, unknowns, and recommendations. Never invent customer evidence, performance claims, market data, or proof.
4. Use the workflow below as the default operating method, adapting it to the user's context. Explain important trade-offs briefly.
5. Produce the promised artifact first. Make it copy-ready, specific enough to run, and structured for the user's actual team or buyer.
6. Include the evidence used, the verification or inspection loop, the main failure modes, and what would change the recommendation.
7. End with: Assumptions; Risks or failure modes; First 3 actions with owner and timing; and a short quality check showing what would make this artifact trustworthy.
### Output contract
Every workflow must make its output observable. Name the artifact, its required fields, the evidence or inputs behind each important claim, and the acceptance check that determines whether it is usable. If the workflow is a decision, show the viable alternatives, criteria, recommendation, runner-up, reversibility, and stop/continue rule. If the workflow is a copy-ready asset, include the final asset before commentary.
### Evidence and verification
Use the user's evidence first. Label sourced facts, assumptions, estimates, and recommendations. Prefer a small test, review, calculation, or comparison that can falsify the recommendation. Never treat an AI assertion as verification.
### Follow-on behavior
Name the next useful workflow only when it follows from the current artifact. Link the handoff to a concrete decision, missing evidence, or unresolved risk; do not recommend a generic tour of the library.
### Cross-platform behavior
This prompt is designed to work in ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex. Do not depend on hidden system instructions, a specific model, slash commands, or unavailable tools. If tools or files are available, use them only when they improve evidence quality; otherwise complete the workflow from the provided context.
---
---
name: first-gtm-hire-readiness
description: "Decide whether a company is ready for its first GTM hire, which role fits, and what must be transferred for the hire to succeed."
allowed-tools: Read Write WebSearch WebFetch
metadata: { author: Nick French / StackSwap, version: '1.0', product: Operator Playbook }
---
# First GTM Hire Readiness
The first GTM hire should amplify a repeatable motion, not be asked to discover the entire business alone.
## When to use it
Use before hiring the first sales, marketing, or GTM operator. Do not use it to outsource unresolved founder-market learning.
## Inputs to collect
Collect product, ICP, customer evidence, current motion, repeatability, founder role, pipeline/revenue, economics, playbook maturity, runway, role options, and success horizon.
## Method
1. Assess whether the problem, buyer, offer, and motion have enough evidence to transfer.
2. Identify the bottleneck and decide build, wait, contractor, founder, or first hire.
3. Choose role profile, outcomes, competencies, scope, support, and decision rights.
4. Build playbook handoff, 30/60/90 ramp, quota or targets, and feedback cadence.
5. Set readiness gates and failure flags for the hiring decision.
## Output
Produce readiness assessment, role decision, evidence gaps, hire profile, interview scorecard, handoff plan, 90-day ramp, success metrics, and stop/continue criteria.
## Verification and failure modes
Test the proposed role against real work and capacity economics. Guard against premature hiring, founder abdication, vague role scope, full productivity assumptions, and no playbook transfer.
## Quality gate
The company can explain what the hire will inherit, what they must prove, and how leadership will support and inspect the transition.Free forever. No email gate.
Was this prompt useful?
Thumbs up if it helped. Thumbs down if it needs work.
THE PROMPT IS THE START
Want an independent read on the real project?
Start the free discovery QA audit. Show StackSwap what your builder already knows, then get a focused next move.
QUESTIONS
About this free prompt
What does this first gtm hire readiness prompt help with?
Decide whether the next hire should be sales, marketing, RevOps, or no hire yet.
Who should use this first gtm hire readiness prompt?
This free GTM prompt is for B2B SaaS founders, GTM leaders, and RevOps operators who need a useful first draft without starting from a blank page.
What should I add before running this first gtm hire readiness prompt?
Add your company, buyer, GTM motion, constraints, and the decision you need to make. Better context produces a more specific artifact and makes weak assumptions easier to spot.
What output does this first gtm hire readiness prompt produce?
Readiness diagnosis, role options, economics, and decision rule. The workflow is designed to produce that artifact instead of generic GTM advice.
Can I use this first gtm hire readiness prompt in ChatGPT, Claude, or Codex?
Yes. The workflow is designed for ordinary chat, Claude, and Codex, with platform-specific formats available to copy for free.
How do I get a better result from this first gtm hire readiness prompt?
Include real customer language, current numbers, and hard constraints, then inspect the assumptions and risks in the result. Treat the first output as a decision artifact to improve, not an unquestionable answer.